Blackout

Someone once said you are only three meals from anarchy.  So it was with some trepidation I watched a docu drama on Channel 4 television (UK) called “Blackout”.  Trepidation because I thought the drama would be quite harrowing, and it was.  As a drama I thought it semi worked.  (Others have been quite critical).  The idea was that the people involved in situation in the blackout filmed it on their mobiles (whose batteries lasted implausible amounts of time).  This worked quite well (obviously a lot was shot as a third party view on normal digital cameras).  The main problem was that the people who wrote it ensured we followed for the most part extreme and unsympathetic characters.  However, as a concept the drama worked very well.  Anyone watching Blackout could have been left in no doubt about our extreme dependency on very large amounts of ready high grade energy.  There was of course things you would never of thought about.  The blackout (apparently caused by a cyber attack) only affected the electricity grid, but traffic chaos soon descended cause traffic lights were down and no one could refuel since the pumps on filling stations have no back up power.  This of course would paralyse the emergency services and food distribution.  Being self sufficient is no solution since once those around you know they would attack you (there was a rapid breakdown in law and order with widespread looting).

What we are wrote about in “No oil in the lamp” was a gradual diminution of our current system, even in our worst case futurology scenario it takes years for the collapse of civilisation.  Can we learn anything from this drama (since hopefully a cyber attack is unlikely) a sudden collapse of our energy system is remote*?

Microgrids, covered on this blog in the past, are probably not much help as they would be linked to the national grid by internet or intranet control.  Other things like making our food systems more localised or resilient would seem more useful.  Local communities planning ahead about how to cope in such situations and how to to protect the vulnerable would seem a good idea and the transition movement has been involved in such discussions.  Churches could be the focal point of all this of course.  But ultimately there seems little we can do except pray such a scenario never occurs. Working towards a post oil system would help to make us more able to cope.  Finally I hope if threatened I would manage to turn the other cheek (Matthew 5v39).

Neil

* The exception to this is an electromagnetic pulse from sun activity.  This could burn everything electrical and electronic out since all of these things act as an aerial.  It would take years to get the grid up an running not a week as in “Blackout”.  The crazy thing is protecting the grid against this is possible and the cost is very low.

Posted in Reviews | Leave a comment

One thing we have learnt this week-food banks and energy

One thing we have learnt this week is about food banks and energy.  There was another big report on food banks in the Guardian newspaper this week.  As I have blogged on here I don’t like food banks.  However, in this article there was a plainly a link between high food and energy prices.  People were struggling with both and of course as we have written about in our book there is a link.

Oil plays a significant part in modern food production because it provides fuel for tractors, combine harvesters and all the other machines used in modern food production. Oil also provides the feedstock for agrochemical production, and natural gas is used in the production of fertiliser. Beyond the farm gate, the storage, processing, transportation and presentation of food all involve substantial inputs of oil to get it on to the store shelf. Given this dependence, the expected peaking and decline in world energy supplies will inevitably have profound effects for food production and food security around the world.

This link looks set to continue.  Of course part of the problem is economic. Median wages in the US and UK and probably other countries have not risen for 20 years and certainly here wages have been lower than inflation since 2008.  Most people at the middle and bottom don’t just feel worse off, they are worst off.

Neil

Posted in One thing we have learnt this week | Leave a comment

How to manage excess power

In a previous post on smart meters I raised the issue in passing of what to do with excess power output that may occur from very large penetration of  PV systems on the low voltage grid.  Germany is facing this issue now with wind and solar.  During the working week in summer this is not an issue as German industry (which moans about the cost of electricity) absorbs all the sun power produced. The problem arises at weekends when the 32GWp of installed capacity (at the end of 2012) is operating at anything like full capacity.  Last summer an estimate is that nearly 30GW of electricity was produced from the PV systems making up perhaps 50% of demand.  Surprising although it may seem this is could be a serious issue.  The problem is that if there is excess power on an electricity grid the voltage and grid frequency rise outside defined limits and the grid will shut down. So far the Germans seem to have managed the situation with few outages.  There are a number of solutions briefly covered below to this.  These are;

  • Use the excess power yourself.  Not an easy one this if lots of people are off work although as covered in the post linked to on this blog above smart grids and meters could help here by encouraging people to use washing machines and bread makers when electricity is cheap, which it will be when you have loads of it.
  • Switch off conventional power stations.  Obviously a whole heap of nuclear, coal and gas power stations are operating continuously providing baseload power.  These can be taken off line (not nuclear since they takes weeks to start back up again).  In fact recently RWE announced the permanent closure of a number of coal fired power stations as the wholesale power price had dropped too low to make them economically viable.  Of course if you go too far down this line you will have insufficient electricity and a grid outage for that reason.  Nevertheless its encouraging renewables are shutting coal down.
  • Sell your excess power to your neighbours.  Germany is doing this, despite the nuclear phaseout and the immediate shutting of a number of old reactors Germany is exporting large amounts of electricity and is a net exporter of electricity. However, there are problems with this solution.  First you may find they don’t need it.  Second, the Germans are selling expensively subsidised electricity at a loss to their neighbours.  It should be pointed out that these subsidies for new systems are much lower than they were and phase complete phase out of the FIT at 55GWp of installed capacity (which is only 2-3 years away) is planned.
  • Store the excess power.  Germany is building more pumped storage, but obviously this can only be a partial solution.
  • With PV systems being the problem, could they be the solution?  A number of solutions present themselves at the micro-generation scale.  Firstly, the individual householder could be encouraged to store electricity and use it at night.  The Germans are being encouraged to do this with a subsidy of some type, although uptake has been low.  Second, the PV inverters which convert DC from the PV to AC for home or grid use monitor the grid conditions.  In fact this is part of the problem.  Say its a dull day in July and the sun comes out and PV is suddenly producing 50% of the electrical supply.  The voltage rises and takes its outside the voltage limits set by the German government for PV inverters.  Millions of inverters shut down but not before you have taken base coal fired power baseload generation off line.  You go from feast to famine in minutes and have an outage.  However, you can by regulation use this grid monitoring facility to aid this control of the grid in a number of different ways.  You can set the inverter to trim its power output (lower its efficiency) when the grid conditions reach a certain voltage or frequency and switch off at a higher frequency (50.2Hz).  This is what the Germans have done.  Another thing they are doing I understand is trying to encourage PV system installation on west facing roofs to spread the peak output over the day.  Another strategy I would suggest is that inverters have different cut-off settings.  So for example in the north of Germany the voltage and frequency settings are set higher than say in Bavaria where its sunnier.  This means not all inverters cut power or cut at the same point and people in Northern Germany are not losing as much money.

There is no doubt that excessive renewables production is a challenge, but one that is not unmanageable with probably all the strategies above required in combination.  Since conventional fuels are finite we will have to cope with this problem at some point in the future. Other countries need to think about this.  There is an estimate that in July the UK got 2.5% of its electricity from PV over 24 hours and about 6% at around midday.  We are way behind Germany but we don’t need as much PV installed for us to catch up.

Neil

Posted in other, Renewables | Leave a comment

One thing we have learnt this week- political tensions and oil

Political tensions and oil are still an issue.  As tensions in the middle east and between Russia and the US have ratcheted up this week, so has the oil price.  It hasn’t gone up as much as you would think and some of the rise maybe due to improving economic news, but it still shows for all the talk of “Saudi America” how important the middle east is to world oil and gas supplies.

As we wrote in “No oil in the lamp”;

The Middle East holds a critical position in terms of future oil
supply simply because such a large proportion of the remaining
global reserves of oil (and gas) are there. On a list of the world’s
largest oil fields, 28 out of the top 40 are located in the region. (The
world’s largest, the Ghawar field in Saudi Arabia, was discovered in
1948, started producing in 1951, and is still pumping out around
5 million barrels per day 60 years later.) The Middle East is also,
crucially, a place of unresolved conflict over the existence of the
state of Israel, the position of the Palestinians and their competing
demands for land and sovereignty. These seemingly insurmountable
problems remain as a point of tension with the Arab world, and are
likely to continue to do so whatever political changes take place.

It seems like gas and electricity prices already expected to rise 5-10% in the UK this Autumn since old coal fired power stations are going off line, are going to rise still further.  Even if other countries will not see like us such price increases, we will all see increases in the cost of transport, food and materials. Our book has never looked more relevant.

Neil

Posted in One thing we have learnt this week | Leave a comment

Smart meters, the latest controversy…

Forgot wind turbines and even fracking, the latest controversy set to hit the energy world is smart meters.  The UK has one of the largest programmes of smart meter installation in the world.  The news was this week that the programme has been delayed by a year.  Not the first such delay I believe and being cynical not the last.

Before we get to the controversy, what are these devices meant to do?  As we said in our book smart meters are meant to “monitor total energy consumption in real time and predict and manage trends.”.  We wrote about smart meters in the context of smart grids and devices.  The flow of electricity in the future will be a two-way flow between
consumers and the grid (with most consumers having micro-generation fitted).  The price of power will vary greatly depending on demand and consumers will use smart devices such as washing machines which spread the load by switching themselves on when the electricity is plentiful and cheap. (British Gas are encouraging their customers to do this now as they start to fit smart meters).  With a very high penetration of micro-generation controlling the grid will become that much more difficult as the Germans are finding with over 30GWp of PV installed.  On workdays the problem is not so difficult, but on weekends the very high PV output is providing up to 50% of Germany’s power in summer.  This could lead ironically to grid shut-down as two things happen if there is an excess of power (the grid frequency and voltage rise).  Both of these have to operate within set limits otherwise electronic devices using the power can be damaged.  There are a number of technical solutions to this problem but it would be easy to manage with smart meters.

These would send data to the grid management utility periodically, say every 30 minutes, telling them how much power you are using and if you generate how much you are producing.  A display would tell you this, also how much you are paying for any imported power (and presumably exported power) as well.  They would obviously do away with the demand for meter readers as well, which is why the utilities are so keen on them.  They should allow users to save energy.

The controversy is as follows.  Firstly,  of course cost.  Someone has to pay for this and the consumer will have to foot the bill through increased electricity and gas charges (they will measure gas use as well).  The cost is somewhere between £100-300 per person.  The idea is that smart meters should save the user money although the kind of savings being talked about are small, so will take many years to be recouped by the user-although this is at today’s power prices.

The second controversy is over privacy and security.  There are a number of aspects to this.   Your utility will learn a lot about how you use energy (and try to sell you services on the back of this data).  So will will anyone else who can hack into or intercept your data.  Of course people will be able to tell when you are sleeping or out.  There are supposed to be cases in Germany of people whose houses have been robbed due to thieves getting their hands on this data. The last issue is that of cyber security.  A number of states have already been implicated in cyber attacks and there are concerns that hackers could completely shut down the grid by switching the meters off remotely.

I personally feel that these concerns are overblown or with good design can be removed completely.  On the issue of your power company knowing your energy use pattern.  So what.  They can only guess at what you are up to.  With 22 million smart meters or how ever many there will be (this number does not include businesses) thieves are unlikely to choose you.  This can also be designed out.  Currently smart meters use 4G phone technology to transmit the data.  If power-line transfer technology* was used instead then hackers would find it very much more difficult to intercept the transmissions at source.  They would have to hack the utility which they could do now.  This would also overcome the problem British Gas seem to be having when they turn up to fit a meter and find there is 4g coverage.  The problem with shut down by hackers is due to the utilities wanting to cut non-payers off remotely.  Firstly, I would say people who cannot pay should not be cut off and they should be more humane ways of dealing with this (renegotiating payment comes to mind).  But if this has to be done why not cut-off to be done by someone coming around with a key which allows them to turn a switch?

Despite the concerns I still think that smart meters have too many advantages over grid management and energy conservation to be ruled out.  Most of these concerns could be mitigated with some thoughtful design.

*uses a frequency very different from 50Hz mains to transmit a signal along a power cable (say 600Hz), this has no effect on electrical equipment used to 50Hz.

Neil

Posted in other, Renewables | Leave a comment

One thing we have learnt this week- parallels

There are often parallels between the past and the present.  This occurred to me as I mulled over Greenbelt, in particular the communion service which looked back over the last 40 years of the festival.  Which year would I be talking about 1973 or 2013 in the following description?  A year in which there was a middle eastern war which led to tensions between Russia and USA (and other countries on either side), the price of oil soared and there was the threat of power cuts in the UK with a dire economic situation.  In fact parallels between the two years mean it could be either.

There are course some differences as well as parallels.  In 1973 the miners in the UK helpfully went on strike (the mining industry was state owned, although there had been national strikes when it was in the private sector) during an oil crisis caused by the Yom Kippar war.  Since coal provided more than 40% of our electricity plus a lot of heating this led to power rationing in the UK, along with petrol rationing caused by the Arab oil embargo.  We call this the 3 day week.  I can remember some aspects of the 3 day week well even though I was quite young, since we were off school (hurrah),  we had lots of homework (boo).  My mum worked part time as a teacher and parents looked after each others children.  I went round to my friend Adrian’s house.  He had both a Scale electric set and a Hornby OO permanently set-up on huge boards that lent against a wall.  We had a go at the Scale electric but I’ve always been more interested in trains than cars so I persuaded him to get the other board into place.  It was fully landscaped with trees and hills, station, tunnels etc and we started putting the trains out and people on platforms, then the power went out.  What I can only vaguely remember is the huge queues of cars at filling stations and don’t remember shops lit by candles (although they were).  I do remember my mum lighting the oven opening its door to let the heat out and us all sitting there by candle light around it.  With the electricity off it was the only source of heat.

The energy crisis had a huge effect on me.  In fact its probably part of the reason that I wanted to write our book.  But its effects were far wider than that.  For the first time people started thinking seriously about energy in general and oil dependency in particular.  Research in alternative energy started and a few years later the first early wind turbines and solar panels started appearing.  In the UK along with the advent of cheap north sea natural gas, individuals, government and businesses started quietly reducing their dependency on coal.  The coal heaps we played on at School until we were chased off, unnoticed by us, disappeared.  Governments forced car manufacturers to make their cars more fuel efficient and overall Western countries gradually cut their energy consumption per head.

2013 is not the same, despite the parallels.  There are no unions ready to go on strike.  With concern about climate change cars have been made an order of magnitude more efficient.  There are multitude of different ways to generate electricity apart from hydro, coal, nuclear, oil and gas and these renewable methods have costs that are plunging.  Nevertheless the spectre of a wider middle eastern conflict loams.  A worrying proportion of the world’s gas and oil passes through the strait of Hormuz.  Iran, Syria’s friend could try to disrupt it, but even without some analysts say the price of oil could reach a record high.  There is another final difference compared to 1973, conventional oil production has almost certainly peaked and last year conventional gas reserves showed their first ever fall.  We are however still very dependent on oil. This leaves us with another set of parallels between ’73 and ’13, the energy challenge posed by 1973 is not over.  In fact it maybe just be beginning.

Neil

Posted in One thing we have learnt this week | Leave a comment

Thoughts about Greenbelt on its 40th birthday

 

Amadou & Mariam play GB 2013 main stage

Amadou & Mariam play GB 2013 main stage

Again we have just returned from Greenbelt.  I first went in 1983 with the church youth group to Knebworth (the year after a certain up and coming Irish band gatecrashed the main-stage).  I went back as a student in 1984, 1985, 1986 and for the evening in ’87 (Castle Ashby) to see Bruce Cockburn.  I started going again 4 years ago, mostly to try with Andy to raise the profile of peak oil amongst Christians.  I’ve never had a bad Greenbelt yet (even last years washout).  What are my thoughts 40 years on and particularly from a ecological perspective, especially as Greenbelt might have to move venue?

40 years is an opportunity to look back and Greenbelt took it at full throttle.  A documentary film has been made giving the history of the festival.  Clips of of this showing some greybeards interviewed about the greenbelt festivals founding were shown along various of the music  and other activities etc. – it looks good and I’ll be buying a copy.  I don’t remember ever having been filmed, but you never know.

Various other greybeards featured in some reformed bands that had appeared over the festivals history.  A very good idea which added to the usual highly eclectic mix of music.  (This year there was more roots and folk than ever which was great.  Greenbelts variety must only be second to Glasto.)

There were fewer big name speakers here this year.  Only Jim Wallis was really well known but Barbara Brown Taylor was the new festival star packing out all the venues she spoke at.  However, returning to this blogs raison d’etre there was almost nothing I can find on the programme relating to the environment.  Our ten minute talks were almost the only nod in this direction apart from one other 10 minute talk I am aware of on cycling.  This is curious since the environment was raised in the communion service.  This looked back over 40 years again and the changes that had occurred in women’s rights, ecology and globalisation and development.  This retrospective missed out the 1973 energy shock (OK Greenbelt started in 1974, but there was a second one in ’79) and relating it to today with with almost record energy prices and war in the middle east.

As Greenbelt goes forward its to be hoped that the organisation team do think about the environment.  There did not appear to be recycling at this years festival, unless the company were going to separate the recyclable waste afterwards and more people seem to have come by car this year than the last 3 years.  If the venue does have to move access to public transport, recycling and energy (an all tented site would be much more difficult to provide sustainable power for) need to be considered.

Neil

 

 

Posted in Reviews | 2 Comments

One thing we have learnt this week – C of E and fracking

One thing we have learnt this week is the Church of England has a confused attitude to fracking. It doesn’t want to rule it out due to fuel poverty. According to the Guardian the church denies this is due to the church commissioners wanting to invest in fracking.  (For those who are not Anglicans the church commissioners are a branch of the civil service that invest money on the Church’s behalf.  In actual fact the church has very little say how its money is invested). If the commissioners are going invest money in fracking it looks like being a very poor investment judging all the trouble at Balcombe.
Meanwhile the bishop of Chichester has said the entire debate needs to be more challenging.  He said;

The debate behind the fracking protest needs to be more challenging.  We should be asking deeper questions about our own lifestyle today.  How much less can we demand from the earth and still live rich and fulfilled lives?  What investment should we be making in alternative uses of our resources that will benefit future generations?

A valid point that the church would do well to remember.  In addition I would question whether it will bring down natural gas costs.  More likely it will lock us into ever spiralling gas prices as well as having detrimental effects on climate change and the world’s poorest. I would suggest the church needs to get its act together here before the drilling rigs start arriving in its parishioners back yards.  They are not going to be happy.

Justin Welby has a copy of our book “No oil in the lamp”, lets hope he reads it.  Our book is now available in Kobo format.  This post is a day early since we are off to Greenbelt.

Neil

Posted in One thing we have learnt this week | Leave a comment

Population (part 2)

Population, a highly controversial subject rarely talked about in green circles has been raised on the “Seedbed” website. I have a number of criticisms of this article some of which were raised in a previous post.

As well as the criticisms made in the previous blog post I did not agree with biblical assumptions made in the article.  Whilst its true that in the old testament there a number of encouragements to multiply (Genesis 1v28, 9:7, 17v2, 22v17 and some verses in Proverbs for example) there is nothing in the new testament at all that suggests this (or to be fair the opposite).  Jesus blessed the children and told us to be like them in our faith, but despite what Dan Brown and others have written he never had any of his own.  I would describe the new testament as being neutral on the issue.  We are told, however, to care for creation  (Genesis 2:15) which is difficult to do with so many of us stripping the planet of its resources.  We had a post from someone who did their doctoral thesis on this very issue after the first blog post.  To read the thesis and look at this issue from a far deeper theological perspective follow this link.

The main reason given in the article for Christians having bigger families seems to be that Christians need to multiply to maintain church numbers

Very simply, it is hard to hold onto children in a congregation if Christian husbands and wives are not conceiving children.”

This in my view is both a highly simplistic and unrealistic way of looking at things.  My understanding from my minister (who had contacts with the Billy Graham organisation on this) and others is that the church in the US is concerned they may be at the start of a decline in the church to European levels of secularisation.  If this is so then this is not the biblical way to reverse this (1Peter2v12).  I belong to a large UK church that although not mega church sized by US standards has hundreds of primary aged children.  The numbers drop off dramatically as they hit teenage years.  We loose those children for a variety of reasons, some out-with our control.

Another assumption made in the article was that not having children makes us more materialist since we would have more disposable income.  This might be true but what is almost certainly true is that if families have more children they will work longer hours to maintain that income.  I don’t like the idea that its women who bear the children and will do most of the childcare (and surveys suggest most of the housework).  I’m very uncomfortable with implying that women should do this.  Its indicative of an increasingly conservative view on the role of women in the US church circles and its not one I share. Finally the fact that Wesleys had loads of children is irrelevant as an argument.  They had no access to contraception.

There some other reasons not mentioned in the article as to why having bigger families is not a good idea.  Immigration is a big issue in the US and UK at the moment.  In the UK we are struggling to fit everyone in (with a surprise increase in the birth rate).  This has led to a high unwelcoming atmosphere with government sponsored vans going around telling illegal immigrants to go home. I’m not happy with this and believe we should welcome those from abroad- but overcrowding gives those who don’t an excuse.

Of course there are many, many issues for the population control lobby to face as well.  The UK pressure group population matters wants the UK to reduce its population by around 2/3.  This is cloud cuckoo land.  The problem is whilst I agree that we should try to do this the policy levers in a democracy are very limited and the lag period makes it too late for this in terms of peak oil and climate change.

Lastly I should add I have 3 children.  In some ways I feel guilty about this and I try constantly to keep my ecological footprint to a minimum.  The reasons for this family size are private.

Please feel to explore this issue more not least in our book/ebook.

Neil

Posted in Faith, other, Peak oil | 4 Comments

One thing we have learnt this week – ebook

Our ebook “No oil in the lamp” is on sale in kindle format.NO OIL ebook  The partial updated ebook comes out at an interesting time with constant talk of fracking in the media, but also indications just in the news today that the higher price of energy in the UK is starting to make people use less.  This as we have blogged before on this website is happening with car use, with petrol and diesel sales consistently falling for several years now.

These are encouraging signs but we still face an epic task, vital if we are to switch away from fossil fuels whilst conserving our climate.  We would commend the book to you for you to start exploring this issue from a Christian perspective.

As Ian Marchant said in his forward;

Against the background of some debate about peak oil in energy
circles, there is a distinct and deafening silence from the wider
Christian community and therefore a lack of a Biblical perspective
on this vital issue. In No Oil in the Lamp Neil and Andy have
tackled this gap head on.

By the way don’t want to buy a kindle but want to read ebooks?  I’ve just discovered there is a free phone app for all platforms.

Neil

Posted in Book, One thing we have learnt this week | Leave a comment