About our book

Details of what our book “No oil in the lamp” is about can be found here. More blog posts will follow next week.

Neil

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

One thing we have learnt this week

We are facing steep power increases in the UK over the next few years as old coal, gas and oil powered plants go off line. Off course what Buchanan didn’t mention is that gas is a duel fuel used not only to make electricity but also heat our houses.  So we can expect all parts of our bills to rise.  Today we learnt the government are worried tankers carrying gas from Qatar are vulnerable to terrorist attack.  We should have invested in more energy efficiency and renewables which would have saved use from the worst of this crisis.

Interestingly the graph above has no solar shown on it, even though there is enough to be visible now.  This will be the real winner over the next 5 years.  With PV costs having fallen many people will be investing in systems to protect themselves from power increases.  The people hit hardest will be the poorest in our society and as we argued in our book some way has be found to protect them.

Neil

 

Posted in One thing we have learnt this week | Leave a comment

Neil has an article in “The Edge”

Neil has written a short article on the background to our book which can be seen here on page 14 if you are interested.

Posted in Book | Leave a comment

Energy and crisis

Rarely can a book have had so much free publicity in such a short time as “No oil in the lamp” has over the last few days.  Alistair Buchanan the head of OFGEM gave speech stating the UK faces a “near crisis” in its energy supply as 10% of the power stations are about to be closed (by April).  These are coal fired and an oil fired station that no longer meet EU emission rules.  The closure of these stations are good news for the climate but bad news for our energy security in the medium term.  We will only have 5% rather than 15% extra capacity in our electricity system and potentially face power cuts if there are some power station outages.  We also face immediate price increases and large increases in prices over the next few years as new gas powered stations are built to replace them and we have to purchase natural gas on the world markets when international supplies will be tight.  China’s gas demand is rising 20% a year and Japan is importing lots of gas.

How have we got our selves in this mess? Is it as the Daily Mail believes that its pandering to middle class greenery?  Buchanan kind of agreed with this as he said that the global financial crash had wiped out investment for low carbon alternatives which are expensive being in early stages of development.  I don’t entirely as you can imagine.  I think what we are facing is a classic case of being in denial about fossil fuel addiction.  Successive governments have largely ignored energy policy but have switched from backing renewables (2003), nuclear (2005), carbon capture and storage-clean coal (in between) to gas now (the belief being home fracking is the answer-when we will have to import it).  All along our indigenous natural gas supplies (along with oil have been in decline) meaning we buy more and more gas from places like Qatar at international prices.  No government has wanted to admit that oil and gas will one day run out.  My domestic electricity and gas bills have risen dramatically over the last ten years, gas prices rose nearly 50% in 2011 alone.  This was not due to green energy but natural gas price increases.

What we should have done is invested more in renewables.  It seems crazy and expensive when fossil fuel power is cheap.  When I bought my solar hot water system whilst the carbon savings were considerable, economically it was a joke.  However, 11 years later its on the brink of paying for itself with years of life left in it.  The same with my first solar system.  The cost of renewables is fixed at the time of installation, the fuel is free and the running costs are very low.  Fossil fuel prices are rising constantly meaning the running costs are constantly rising.  A country that doesn’t recognise this will suddenly turn round and realise its energy security is gone and suffer huge rises in energy bills.  This is what has happened to the UK.  Its only 10 years ago we were a net exporter of gas.  On an individual basis my renewables and a lot of energy efficiency measures have meant my bills have hardly risen in real terms.  I’ve protected myself against energy price increases and have made a better return than keeping the money in the bank.

Its not all bad news.  Renewables have been like motherhood and apple pie to successive governments.  We have managed to install a lot of solar and wind in the last few years and 2012 was a record year for renewable electricity production in the UK.  The fixed price of renewables is evident in the graphs below with a fall in prices in about 2020.  The Guardian usefully put a link on its website to a spreadsheet from the Department of Energy and Climate change (DECC).  This attempts to predict gas, diesel, petrol and electricity prices until 2030. I’ve plotted the gas (converting from therms to KWh) and electricity prices.  DECC offer low, medium and high predictions.  What is worrying is that I am paying more for electricity and almost as much for gas than even the high prediction in 2013.  2001-12 figures are actual historical figures.

I’ve plotted one more graph.  Taking the average increases year on year from 2001-12 for residential prices from DECC and extrapolating them forward we get this.

At an Eco-congregation meeting a few nights ago someone suggested if we couldn’t cut our churches energy use we should concentrate on cutting our members energy use.  I felt this was a cop out.  We need to do both.  We are wasting some of our churches money on heating and lighting our buildings when we could be doing something much more worthwhile with the money (evangelism, helping the poor etc.)

As Tim Yeo MP Chair of the environmental audit committee put it on the news “The days of cheap energy are over”.  The question is as Christians are we going to ignore this?

Neil

Posted in gas, Lifestyle, Nuclear, Peak oil, Renewables | Leave a comment

The good life

I was sad to hear of Richard Briers death yesterday.  Although I was a bit too young to watch the “Good life” when it first came out I grew up watching some of the latter series and repeats.  For our many non-British readers Richard Briers was best known for his role in a sitcom called “The Good life”.  In it he played a well off man in a good job called Tom Good who persuaded his wife (Barbara) to give it all up to become self sufficient in their smart suburban house.  Their activities were carried out much to the horror of their posh neighbours who were dragged in to helping catch pigs and harvest cabbages.

There was a serious side to what was a well acted, scripted and amusing sitcom.  The backdrop was the 1973 oil crisis and a series of economic problems.  Food prices shot up due its oil dependency.  Apparently inspired by the programme thousands of people really did sell up and try to become self sufficient more plausibly moving to the country to do so (Tom and Barbara could never have grown enough food on the small urban garden they had).

At that time being self sufficient was all the rage.  The Centre for Alternative Technology (CAT) set up about the same time encouraged this with energy (of which there was no mention in “The Good life”, perhaps because the technology was undeveloped and very expensive).  However, since then then CAT and others encourage mutual interdependence.  So for example my electricity from my PV systems goes to my immediate neighbours.  Survivalism so popular in the US is never going to work.  Instead we need to build communities as encouraged in Acts 2v-44-45, something my homegroup has just begun to explore.

Neil

Posted in Intentional living, Practical low carbon living, Transition | Leave a comment

Keystone XL pipeline

Over the last few months the internet has been full of activity over the Keystone XL pipeline.  Here is some brief background on the project from a new book “Carnival Kingdom Biblical Justice for Global Communities“.

“Over the last year there has been a considerable battle in the United States over the Keystone XL pipeline that would bring oil from the tar sands in Alberta, Canada to Texas. The extraction process is very damaging to the local environment in Alberta, and poses some threat to important aquifers should the pipeline ever break. The amount of carbon locked up in the tar sands is huge and would contribute a massive amount of CO2 to the atmosphere should it ever get burnt. Many have argued that the best policy is to leave the tar sands underground and to concentrate on developing renewable energy sources. James Hansen, the top NASA climate scientist, stressed the dangers of exploiting the tar sands stating that it would be “game over for the climate” if the carbon was used.

In August 2011 over 1000 peaceful demonstrators were arrested outside the White House in Washington D.C. at a demonstration coordinated by Bill McKibben and 350.org. The demonstration concerned the building of the Keystone XL pipeline mentioned above.
As we have already noted, the potential for carbon emissions from tar sands products is huge. Those arrested at the demonstration included Bill McKibben, James Hansen and the actress Daryl Hannah. On November 6, 2011, twelve thousand people formed a human chain around the White House to protest against the pipeline. Four days later President Obama announced a delay in the decision on the pipeline permit until at least
2013, while further environmental reviews were carried out. As we write there is still a battle going on over the pipeline with attempts to build sections of it being met by fierce resistance from 350.org and its allies.  In many of these cases demonstrators are directly attempting to block the development of the pipeline, and their action is more than symbolic.”

from “Carnival Kingdom Biblical Justice for Global Communities“.

Some of the pipeline is in operation but what campaigners are trying to stop is a number of extensions to it.  Yesterday there was a huge rally in Washington to attempt to stop these next phases and call for climate action.  Whilst we did not cover the XL pipeline specifically in “No oil in the lamp” we do not approve of the use of unconventional oil or gas (which we have written about in some detail).  Apart from the environmental damage (CO2 and landscape) the tar sands use vast amounts of natural gas which would be better left in the ground (preferably) or either used to heat houses or generate electricity.  The energy return of oil from Tar sands is so low (probably as low as 3:1) as to make the whole thing a nonsense.  After pumping it over 2000 mile across North America this energy return is surely going to be unity.  Bizarrely the oil boom in Alberta maybe over (see our books Facebook wall for a link to that story).  What the whole sorry caper illustrates is our addiction to oil and the need to get off it.

Neil

 

Posted in Peak oil | Leave a comment

Visit the Facebook page

Loads more stuff up there.   More posts will follow here in the next few days.

Neil

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Book even cheaper

Play.com are selling our book even cheaper than before. If you are interested in buying it then play is currently the cheapest place.

Neil

Posted in Book | Leave a comment

One thing we have learnt this week

Renewable energy installation continues to power ahead. Provisional global installation figures for 2012 for wind and solar (likely to be revised upwards) showed wind capacity grew almost 20% last year to reach 282GWp capacity. Solar PV capacity increased to 100GWp from 71GWp in 2011 and 40GWp in 2010. Solar power is slowly overtaking wind in capacity terms. There is much to be gloomy about as we start 2013, but this increase in renewables is surely good news.

Neil

Posted in One thing we have learnt this week | Leave a comment

Wind power – still a cause of debate

2 new wind turbines recently erected on the former airfield at Eye in Suffolk

About 8 miles from my home in rural Suffolk (in the East of England) two wind turbines have recently been erected and will soon be producing electricity. These are the first large ones in this area, though there are several in Norfolk, as well as many more being put up off the coast. As there is a continuing debate around the benefits (or otherwise) of this technology, here are just a few comments:
These turbines are big – 130m to the blade tip, and definitely dominate the local landscape. In the relatively flat East Anglian landscape, there has been concern that these tall structures would have a wide visual impact. However, whilst they appear huge up close (I drove right up to the base of one tower) to my mind, as soon as you get a couple of miles away the impact is muted. The countryside here is not billiard-table flat like parts of the nearby fens. There are undulations in the landscape, trees and small woods which block the view. Only a few miles south is the (much taller) Mendlesham TV mast which we have all become used to. Opposition has been somewhat tempered by the fact that the turbines have been sited on an industrial site, close to a busy main road, which hopefully relieves some concerns about the noise impact.
As I follow the debate around wind power, both nationally and locally (we have been dealing with a series of applications in my own village) I find the debate increasingly polarised: To the “antis” wind farms are a blot on the landscape, a blight on property prices, a source of visual and noise pollution and even the cause of illness. Above all, they are inefficient, don’t actually reduce CO2 emissions, and are a waste of money. In contrast, those in favour see them as a source of clean, green energy and part of the solution to the looming problem of climate change.
For what it’s worth, I see some merit in both arguments, but am generally in favour of them, with the caveat that I would like to see a statutory distance between a wind farm and residential dwellings. I don’t think they are visually intrusive at a distance – in fact to me they look rather elegant. Neither are they as useless as protestors claim – any form of electricity generation is substantially less than 100% efficient, and at least in the case of wind we are not using up a finite resource and producing a pollutant, nor are we leaving a toxic legacy for many generations to come, as with nuclear. However, since this blog is looking at these issues from the perspective of Christian faith, where do we stand? What wisdom can we bring to the situation? One area where perhaps we can help is in bringing a little peace into the debate. Discussions on this issue can be fractious and ill-tempered rather than polite and reasoned. One campaigner described the response to an application as “hate-filled hysteria” Let’s help here at least with salt and light where we can.
A final thought – yesterday a planning application in Devon, for the Totnes community wind farm, was turned down by the local planning authority. One reason given was because it would cause a “loss in amenity” to a local listed building – the church.

Andy

Posted in Renewables | Leave a comment